<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunk While Docking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.planetcrushers.com/heide/archives/2003/06/30/sunk-while-docking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.planetcrushers.com/heide/archives/2003/06/30/sunk-while-docking/</link>
	<description>Just another useless personal blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 01:54:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenn</title>
		<link>http://www.planetcrushers.com/heide/archives/2003/06/30/sunk-while-docking/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetcrushers.com/heide/archives/2003/06/30/sunk-while-docking/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Keep on blogging, you old crotchety geek. :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep on blogging, you old crotchety geek. :-D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 0x01</title>
		<link>http://www.planetcrushers.com/heide/archives/2003/06/30/sunk-while-docking/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>0x01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetcrushers.com/heide/archives/2003/06/30/sunk-while-docking/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>The old double standard rears its&#039; ugly head and roars out: &quot;Too standardized is bad, but too decentralized is bad as well!&quot;

So the pain remains. Do we sit and watch people go apeshit because of open-ended possibility of app behavior under the management of many different environments, or do we allow choices to be abandoned in favor of ease-of-use consistency and standardization of application?

For that matter, since the topic is (possibly) unanswerable questions, what is the meaning of life?

Personally, I&#039;ll go with open-ended choice. I realize the hassles of making that decision, but then, I read somewhere once that &quot;Linux is only for people who have too much time on their hands&quot;. I&#039;m okay with that, true or not. It feels like accomplishment.

Oh, and the meaning of life?

44.94.

(42 + G.S.T.)

-- 0x01
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The old double standard rears its&#8217; ugly head and roars out: &#8220;Too standardized is bad, but too decentralized is bad as well!&#8221;</p>
<p>So the pain remains. Do we sit and watch people go apeshit because of open-ended possibility of app behavior under the management of many different environments, or do we allow choices to be abandoned in favor of ease-of-use consistency and standardization of application?</p>
<p>For that matter, since the topic is (possibly) unanswerable questions, what is the meaning of life?</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;ll go with open-ended choice. I realize the hassles of making that decision, but then, I read somewhere once that &#8220;Linux is only for people who have too much time on their hands&#8221;. I&#8217;m okay with that, true or not. It feels like accomplishment.</p>
<p>Oh, and the meaning of life?</p>
<p>44.94.</p>
<p>(42 + G.S.T.)</p>
<p>&#8211; 0&#215;01</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>


